HyperPicks
Subscription app with 46 AI pick models across 20 leagues. You compare models and subscribe to the ones you want; picks come as a daily trades feed with a suggested bet size.
Our rating in one line: As of 2 Nov 2026, HyperPicks has no Performance score yet (insufficient data): full pick history is for subscribers only; the public page shows only per-model unit totals with no ledger. Transparency score: 0/100 (low transparency).
- Type
- AI pick models marketplace (US sports)
- Sport
- US sports
- Coverage
- US
- Country
- US
- Price
- Entry $39.99/month (1 model), Hero $79.99/month (3 models), Elite $149.99/month (unlimited); free trial (page says free until 2 Nov)
- Results
- Unknown
- Affiliate
- None found on public pages
- First seen
- Domain registered 24 Nov 2025 (RDAP record for hyperpicks.ai, source)
At a glance
- ROI
- Unknown
- Settled bets
- Unknown
- Period
- Unknown
- Evidence
- None
18+. Link may be an affiliate link.
Performance breakdown
Full pick history is for subscribers only; the public page shows only per-model unit totals with no ledger.
| Published record | |
|---|---|
| Settled bets / selections | Unknown |
| Profit / loss | Unknown |
| Level stakes | Unknown |
| ROI | Unknown |
| Odds basis | Unknown |
| Period | Unknown |
| Basis of record | Unknown |
| Notes | Unknown |
| Source | https://hyperpicks.ai/ · checked 26 Oct 2026 |
50 = break-even. Past results don't predict future returns. How we score Performance.
Transparency score breakdown
Home page (read 26 Oct 2026) shows '1,924.70 units all-time profit' across 46 models and 49,584 picks, with sample models such as Titan (+987.47u over 14,469 trades at 0.5u flat). It says every pick is 'logged and public', but the same page says subscribers get the full pick history and no public record page was found, so these figures are self-reported and not verified.
| Criterion | Max | Status | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Picks published before the off, timestamped | 25 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Full public ledger including losers | 25 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Price basis stated (SP, BSP, exchange, CLV) | 15 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| 500+ settled selections | 15 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Methodology documented | 10 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Results downloadable (CSV/API) | 10 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Total | 100 | 0 |
Transparency score: how openly a tool or tipster publishes a record you can verify. How we score Transparency · How to raise a transparency score.
Sources
Is this you? Are you HyperPicks?
If anything on this page is wrong or out of date, or you can share a fuller or newer record, a results page or your methodology, send us the public evidence. We review every request against our published criteria and log every change on the changelog. Ratings can't be paid for and are never influenced by affiliate status.
How to raise your transparency score · the same checklist for everyone
Embed this badge
Free for this listing. It shows the current rating and check date, updates when they change, and links back here. About the badge · Badge terms
Other US sports AI tools we rate
- NoGuessBetsPerformance 44 · Transparency 100
- Leans.aiPerformance insufficient data · Transparency 55
- DimersPerformance insufficient data · Transparency 0
- OddiblePerformance insufficient data · Transparency 0
- OddsTraderPerformance insufficient data · Transparency 0
- OutlierPerformance insufficient data · Transparency 0
Guides: Does AI sports betting work? · All guides
How we check records: The transparency checklist (what counts as evidence) · AI tipping transparency report 2026 (how many records pass)