Tennis Foresight
Walk-forward tennis win probabilities with a strategy builder, weather and tournament data. Publishes a live accuracy record (Brier score, calibration) and, since 7 Oct 2026, model picks graded at flat one-unit stakes.
Our rating in one line: As of 2 Nov 2026, Tennis Foresight's published record shows +6.20% ROI over 654 level-stakes bets (Live model picks, default rules, 7 Oct – 1 Nov 2026), self-reported: Performance 53/100. Transparency score: 40/100 (medium transparency).
- Type
- Tennis probability model
- Sport
- Tennis
- Coverage
- Tennis (ATP, WTA, Challenger)
- Country
- Multi
- Price
- Free account
- Results
- View published results ↗
- Affiliate
- Unknown
- First seen
- Domain registered 9 Oct 2026 (RDAP record for tennisforesight.com, source)
At a glance
- ROI
- +6.20%
- Settled bets
- 654
- Period
- Live model picks, default rules, 7 Oct – 1 Nov 2026
- Evidence
- • Self-reported⚑ Advised odds, may be hard to match
18+. Link may be an affiliate link.
Performance breakdown
| How the score is built | |
|---|---|
| Raw score (50 + 1.25 × ROI, capped 0–100) | 57.8 |
| Bets that count (self-reported, × ½) | 327 |
| Sample weight = bets that count ÷ (bets that count + 500) | 0.395 |
| Performance score = 50 + (raw − 50) × weight | 53 |
| Published record | |
|---|---|
| Settled bets / selections | 654 |
| Profit / loss | +40.50 units (1 unit flat stakes) |
| Level stakes | Yes |
| ROI | +6.20% |
| Odds basis | Best regulated price available when each pick appeared |
| Period | Live model picks, default rules, 7 Oct – 1 Nov 2026 |
| Basis of record | Self-reported |
| Notes | Early sample: under four weeks of picks. The site gives a 95% range of ±11 points on this ROI, so the true figure could be anywhere from about −5% to +17%. Default rules: ATP, expected value 2% or more, odds 1.01 to 30.01, moneyline, set betting and game spread markets, flat 1 unit. Closing-line value as published on 26 Oct 2026: +0.0% (35% of 200 picks beat the closing price). Accuracy over the same live period: the favourite won 63.4% of 298 graded matches (the model said 66.7%). On 18 Oct the live record showed 512 matches; from 26 Oct the page reports graded matches since 7 Oct 2026 (226 then, 298 now) and does not explain the difference. |
| Source | https://tennisforesight.com/track-record · checked 2 Nov 2026 |
50 = break-even. Past results don't predict future returns. How we score Performance.
Transparency score breakdown
The track-record page says every estimate is logged the first time it is published and graded after the match, and that nothing is removed or edited. Model picks are graded at flat one-unit stakes at the best regulated price available when each pick appeared, and closing-line value is reported. We have not confirmed a public pick-by-pick list with publication times, so the before-the-off and full-ledger criteria are not marked as met.
| Criterion | Max | Status | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Picks published before the off, timestamped | 25 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Full public ledger including losers | 25 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Price basis stated (SP, BSP, exchange, CLV) | 15 | ✓ Verified | 15 |
| 500+ settled selections | 15 | ✓ Verified | 15 |
| Methodology documented | 10 | ✓ Verified | 10 |
| Results downloadable (CSV/API) | 10 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Total | 100 | 40 |
Transparency score: how openly a tool or tipster publishes a record you can verify. How we score Transparency · How to raise a transparency score.
- “Favourite won 66.6% of 8,852 ATP matches since July 2024 (the model said 67.5%)” (source, seen 2026-11-02)
Is this you? Are you Tennis Foresight?
If anything on this page is wrong or out of date, or you can share a fuller or newer record, a results page or your methodology, send us the public evidence. We review every request against our published criteria and log every change on the changelog. Ratings can't be paid for and are never influenced by affiliate status.
How to raise your transparency score · the same checklist for everyone
Embed this badge
Free for this listing. It shows the current rating and check date, updates when they change, and links back here. About the badge · Badge terms
Other tennis AI tools we rate
- TIPEROPerformance insufficient data · Transparency 55
- BananaPoint.aiPerformance insufficient data · Transparency 50
- TennisBrainPerformance insufficient data · Transparency 0
Guides: Does AI sports betting work? · All guides
How we check records: The transparency checklist (what counts as evidence) · AI tipping transparency report 2026 (how many records pass)