ModelFights
Runs many large language models on the same brief for each match and grades every pick in public (it says 68,000+ predictions), with a leaderboard of win rate, Brier score and ROI.
Our rating in one line: As of 31 Oct 2026, ModelFights has no Performance score yet (insufficient data): stake and price basis not stated, and the published roi column is not consistent with the units figures. Transparency score: 75/100 (high transparency).
- Type
- AI vs AI public scoreboard (multi-sport)
- Sport
- Multi-sport
- Coverage
- Football, tennis, NFL, MLB, MMA, boxing
- Country
- Multi
- Price
- Free; Pro $29/month; Analyst $99/month
- Results
- View published results ↗
- Affiliate
- Unknown
- First seen
- Domain registered 8 Jun 2026 (RDAP record for modelfights.com, source)
At a glance
- ROI
- Unknown
- Settled bets
- Unknown
- Period
- Unknown
- Evidence
- None
18+. Link may be an affiliate link.
Performance breakdown
Stake and price basis not stated, and the published ROI column is not consistent with the units figures.
| Published record | |
|---|---|
| Settled bets / selections | Unknown |
| Profit / loss | Unknown |
| Level stakes | Unknown |
| ROI | Unknown |
| Odds basis | Unknown |
| Period | Unknown |
| Basis of record | Unknown |
| Notes | Leaderboard as served on 31 Oct 2026 (28,619 graded picks; the page text does not say which time window): high-volume models show large negative units, e.g. Grok 4 Fast −2,393.2 units on 5,005 graded picks, while some low-volume models are positive (e.g. Gemini 3.1 Pro +111.6 on 242). Its ROI column shows figures below −100% (e.g. −556.6%), which cannot be a level-stakes ROI, so we do not use it. |
| Source | https://modelfights.com/leaderboard · checked 31 Oct 2026 |
50 = break-even. Past results don't predict future returns. How we score Performance.
Transparency score breakdown
| Criterion | Max | Status | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Picks published before the off, timestamped | 25 | ✓ Verified | 25 |
| Full public ledger including losers | 25 | ✓ Verified | 25 |
| Price basis stated (SP, BSP, exchange, CLV) | 15 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| 500+ settled selections | 15 | ✓ Verified | 15 |
| Methodology documented | 10 | ✓ Verified | 10 |
| Results downloadable (CSV/API) | 10 | Not yet verified | 0 |
| Total | 100 | 75 |
Transparency score: how openly a tool or tipster publishes a record you can verify. How we score Transparency · How to raise a transparency score.
Sources
Is this you? Are you ModelFights?
If anything on this page is wrong or out of date, or you can share a fuller or newer record, a results page or your methodology, send us the public evidence. We review every request against our published criteria and log every change on the changelog. Ratings can't be paid for and are never influenced by affiliate status.
How to raise your transparency score · the same checklist for everyone
Embed this badge
Free for this listing. It shows the current rating and check date, updates when they change, and links back here. About the badge · Badge terms
Other multi-sport AI tools we rate
- NoSleepHQPerformance 55 · Transparency 50
- Sharper PointsPerformance 53 · Transparency 55
- SportBot AIPerformance 52 · Transparency 75
- ProphetAIPerformance 50 · Transparency 55
- Olympus Bets AnalyticsPerformance 49 · Transparency 85
- Kickscore AIPerformance 49 · Transparency 25
Guides: Does AI sports betting work? · All guides
How we check records: The transparency checklist (what counts as evidence) · AI tipping transparency report 2026 (how many records pass)