BETA
Home / Tipsters / Tom Segal (Pricewise)

Tom Segal (Pricewise)

Long-running Racing Post 'Pricewise' column that advises bets at early bookmaker prices on big races.

Our rating in one line: As of 1 Nov 2026, Tom Segal (Pricewise) has no Performance score yet (insufficient data): no level-stakes p/l or roi published. Transparency score: 40/100 (medium transparency).

Numbers last checked: 1 Nov 2026Entry updated: 17 Oct 2026Changelog
Channel
Racing & sports media
Outlet / platform
Racing Post
Type
Newspaper columnist
Country
UK
Coverage
UK & IE
Price
Paid Racing Post membership. Racing Post lists its Analyst pack (tips from its tipsters) at £60 per quarter and Ultimate at £87 per quarter, checked 25 Oct 2026; the page doesn't say which pack includes Pricewise.
Record
None found (no full public P/L record located)
First seen
Not found yet

At a glance

Low data
PerformanceInsufficient data
40
TransparencyMedium transparency
ROI
Unknown
Settled bets
514
Period
Start of 2022 – early June 2023
Evidence
None
Visit Tom Segal ↗

18+. We are not paid by tipsters listed here.

Performance breakdown

Low data
Insufficient data

No level-stakes p/l or roi published.

Published record
Settled bets / selections514
Profit / lossUnknown
Level stakesYes
ROIUnknown
Odds basisAdvised bookmaker prices
PeriodStart of 2022 – early June 2023
Basis of recordThird-party report (Smart Betting Club)
NotesSmart Betting Club (2 Jun 2023) states the column had 'a small loss over a 514 bet sample' taking all bets since the start of 2022, but gives no exact P/L or ROI for the column itself.
Sourcehttps://smartbettingclub.com/blog/pricewise-with-pcb/ · checked 17 Oct 2026
Sample size and uncertainty
Settled bets in the record514
Approximate 95% range for ROINot shown (the record is too small or incomplete to score)
Re-check cadenceEvery 7 days; next re-check due 8 Nov 2026.

The range is our own calculation from the published record, not the tipster's figure. Winners are paid at different prices, so the true range is at least this wide. How we calculate it.

50 = break-even. Past results don't predict future returns. How we score Performance.

Transparency score breakdown

40
Medium transparency · 40/100
3 of 6 criteria checked · unverified criteria score 0

Bets are published in the Racing Post with advised prices before racing. We did not find a complete public record of all bets with profit and loss.

CriterionMaxStatusPoints
Tips published before the off, timestamped25✓ Verified25
Full record including losers (public ledger or independent tally)25Not yet verified0
Price basis stated (SP, BSP, advised odds)15✓ Verified15
500+ settled selections15Not yet verified0
Approach and staking explained10Not yet verified0
Results downloadable (CSV/API)10✗ Not met0
Total10040

Transparency score: how openly a tool or tipster publishes a record you can verify. How we score Transparency · How to raise a transparency score.

Right of reply

Is this you? Are you Tom Segal (Pricewise)?

If anything on this page is wrong or out of date, or you can share a fuller or newer record, a results page or your methodology, send us the public evidence. We review every request against our published criteria and log every change on the changelog. Ratings can't be paid for and are never influenced by affiliate status.

How to raise your transparency score · the same checklist for everyone

Is this you? Update your listing →Goes to a short page about this listing, then to [email protected]
Embed this badge

Free for this listing. It shows the current rating and check date, updates when they change, and links back here. About the badge · Badge terms

Tom Segal (Pricewise): current rating on AI Sports Ratings

Other horse racing tipsters we rate

All tipster ratings →

Guides: Best horse racing tipsters (UK & Ireland) · Does AI sports betting work? · All guides

How we check records: The transparency checklist (what counts as evidence) · AI tipping transparency report 2026 (how many records pass)